Category Archives: Cinematographicalicious

Film &c.

How Blindness Lets You See

If you have not yet experienced Blindness, either the film or the novel, I encourage you to pick up your preferred version and get to experiencing.

I love and hate recommending this kind of movie.  I love it because it will have such a dramatic impact on your lives.  I hate it because I can’t really tell you anything about it beforehand.

All I can really say is that it is a film about people who suddenly go blind and about the world which this particular and peculiar change creates.  Rest assured it will, like any well crafted piece of art, allow you insights heretofore unobtainable.

Don’t hesitate.  I know a good tale when I see one.

Digital Copy Coasters Cost More

You may have noticed that a lot of movies are offering a second or third disc in their multi-disc offerings which include what they are calling Digital Copy. But, really, what the fuck is Digital Copy?

I mean, for starters, the DVD or Blu-ray is already a digital copy of the film.  What’s so special about the capital letter version?  I read a good article that goes into a modest level of detail for being about a page long, and I encourage the curious to follow that link.

In a nut shell, you are paying around $10 for an extra disc which contains a version of the film you are purchasing which you can then play on your computer or portable device.

“But, Jimbo, I can already play DVD’s (or Blu-rays) on my computer.”

Mostly everyone can play DVD’s on their computers, and certainly anyone can rip a DVD into a format that can be transfered to a portable device (avi, mkv, mpg, &c).  So now you can ask yourself what you or anyone else might need with Digital Copy.  I mean beyond the obvious “I’m lazy and someone already did it for me” route.

But suppose you really are lazy and would like to simplify this shrinking and portability problem.  Then you should certainly steer clear of Digital Copy.

They are using a scheme of digital rights management that will restrict you to use your purchased movie on one device (iTunes or Windows Media Player or your portable device—not all three).  Further, if you have a problem (like a hard drive failure) you are likely to lose your precious Digital Copy and have no reasonable recourse to reclaim it.

(The article I linked to above has some great personal stories of lost Digital Copy in the comments.)

What I find rather irksome is that with many of the new Blu-ray discs coming out, your only choice is a version which includes Digital Copy.  You cannot opt out of that Digital Copy tax in your purchase negotiations.

It’s these damned marketers at it again.  They tout Digital Copy like it’s the greatest thing since chapter selection, but then they hand you a spoonful of honey to which all the flies have already adhered.

Yum.

Oh, and if you’ve already purchased some Digital Copy, you can use them as a nice set of movie themed coasters at your New Year’s party.  I am.

JamesIsIn

What Does a Heart Weigh?

A lot less than seven pounds. A good hunk of meat, that. You could get seven pounds of beef for maybe twenty bucks.  A human heart comes in at perhaps 10 ounces.

But if your heart is broken, how can you go about getting a new one?

Congenital heart disease is no fun, to be sure.  I have just watched a film that works a cure on many levels.  This is a film not to be missed.  I really can’t tell you much about it as it would only detract from the seeing of it.

So, let me just say go buy or rent your copy of Seven Pounds.  Go.

No regrets.

Set The Spanish Prinsoner Free

I have just finished watching a film from 1997 called The Spanish Prisoner.  Special thanks goes to my brother for not merely recommending this film but for gifting me a copy so that I was nearly forced to sit down and watch the thing.

It is an excellent mix of temptation, corporate espionage, intrigue, and Kafka-esque hidden alleys.  As with so many of the finest who-done-its, the film allows the viewer a certain amount of leeway so that we are able chin-scratch along side those in the film who are chin-scratching, and working out who is scratching chin and who is duping whom is an important part of that process.

Would I call it film noir?  Maybe so.

The dialog seems like it comes from a play.  I don’t know what that means to anyone else but it means something to me.  Like the dialog is richer and yet more carefully planned.  At first I thought the acting was a bit stilted but as the film progressed I realized the actors were playing parts of people who were themselves pretending.  In short, don’t be put off by the first ten minutes of the film.  You’ll fail to get at what needs to be gotten at.

So, go watch it.  Or bring me a pizza and we can watch it here.  I’m flexible.

Zombie Fun

Ah, who doesn’t love a good zombie romp?  Admit it, more brains makes you all wiggly within.  I know it does me.

I realize how hard it can be to locate the grain among the zombie chaff.  We don’t all have the time for the thorough threshing necessary to get at the refined kernels.  Thankfully a recommendation has come my way which I am able to now pass on to you.  You can thank my friend Eric for bringing this to my attention.

If you were under the impression that Shaun of the Dead was the last word in zombie excitement, you have been sadly mistaken.  Fido, in its own special way, takes up where Shaun left off.

Fido
Fido

You enter into a 1950’s style utopia where idealized humans live within fenced cities, protected from the wild zombies living in the outlands between the cities.  However, within the cities humans have domesticated zombies.  They are a bit like helper monkeys, except less ferocious thanks to their special collars which inhibit their flesh eating drives.

You think I’m kidding?  This is the real deal.

Don’t waste any time.  You have to see this one.  Feel good movie of the year and all that fluff.

Happy zombie hunting, kids.

JamesIsIn

Music in the Now

I went out last night with a group of friends to see the premiere of a much anticipated documentary on music.  Of course, when one goes out to such an event, one has certain expectations.  Well, I had my first lecture in Unexpected 101.

When the bill says “documentary”, you can expect to be informed and educated on the subject at hand.  And surely there will be a well-formed argument supported by evidence bringing the viewer toward the philosophical position asserted by the thesis of the film-maker.  Who could doubt this?

Yet Icons Among Us delivers something which is so much more—and so much more powerful—than expected that one must feel an urge to liberate it from the constraints of that word, documentary: it is too small a cage for this size of bird.

I have been watching the progress of this release for some time now.  (I think it was seven years in the making.)  The final product has been divided up, so we consumers will have a few options for getting our feet wet.

There is a wealth of information on their official Web site.  In short, what I watched was a theatrical version of the work (coming in just under two hours).  There is also a four part (about four hours in total) series which is being aired at various dates on the Documentary Channel.  (If you visit their site I am told you can sign up to be notified about a DVD release which I imagine would contain both versions.  I have not yet confirmed this with a link.)

Icons Among Us is a philosophical coup de grâce putting into our minds the questions What is music?, What does it mean to be a musician?, and Who am I?  The philosophically weak-of-heart should consult a PhD before seeing this film due to the increased risk of metaphysical myocardial infarctions.  Everyone else, be prepared to enjoy some excellent music during the show, and know that you will want to have scheduled some musical listening after the show: a known side effect is increased musical hunger.  Good medicine.

This is exactly what my friends and I did.

Which brings us to part two of this review.  After the premiere (and after some noodles) we made our way over to Neumos for a show.  (I should take a moment to mention that Icons Among Us was shown as part of SIFF at the Egyptian thanks to various sponsors including DonQ‘s yummy rum.)

I’m really not sure how to talk about the daKAH Hip Hop Orchestra.  Do I describe them as an orchestra which incorporates hip-hop components (such as rappers and scratch), or are they more an MC/DJ combo backed by a full orchestra and a rhythm section?

I swear to you, I have never seen a more exuberant and at the same time technically exquisite violin solo.  Nor would I have been able to guess that an audience could respond to violin work with such powerful vocalizations.  Put plainly, this show (juxtaposed as it was with the documentary) was musical magic.

Ok, so go find a way to watch Icons Among Us and check out the daKAH Hip Hop Orchestra.

Life just keeps getting better.

Congratulations, Sean

Sean Penn won an Oscar for his portrayal of Harvey Milk. I don’t usually give a rat’s fart for who won what in Hollywood, but this one is worth mentioning.

This film (called simply Milk) is a recounting (in near documentary style) of the events leading up to the famous Twinkie Defense.  While the Twinkie Defense has become somewhat a household legend, the work of Harvey Milk has suffered no such equal fame.  Now, though, we all have easy access to the tale.

The film itself is a masterwork of integration.  They have edited together archival footage and historical newscasts into their own footage to weave a magnificent, unified whole.

As to the acting of Penn, there can be no question that he is working at the height of his art.  He imbues every scene with emotional accuracy, helping to solidify the documentary illusion of the piece.

Definitely worthy of a rental.

Alpha Dog Running Hard

I don’t know if anyone told me about this film when it came out.  I don’t have any recollections about it being the theaters.  This isn’t all that surprising when you consider just how many movies are made each year.  I’m bound to miss a few… thousand.

Written and directed by Nick Cassavetes, Alpha Dog is shot in a documentary style and based on a true story.  There are those who may criticize this film for exploiting a tragic tale for their own financial ends.  But it doesn’t feel like an exploitation.  It feels like it offers a sense of history.

Who would criticize Roots for exploiting the sorrow of thousands (millions?) over the centuries?  No, they have a couple of things in common.  They both offer us a sense of history from which we might learn and grow, and they both add meaning to their related tragedies.  (Though it must be acknowledged that Roots does this on a much grander scale.)

I especially enjoyed Ben Foster in the role of Jake Mazursky.  The role represents a dramatic reversal of talents.  His performance here is one of explosive emotion contrasted with his more sniveling rebellious role in The Punisher (the only good version thus far).  Quite a change.  Bravo.

Another notable performance was given by Anton Yelchin (as Zach Mazursky).  We’ll have to keep an eye on him.  He’ll be playing Pavel Chekov in the new Star Trek (out in maybe a week).

In short I enjoyed it.  I don’t want to go into too many details because (assuming you don’t know about the true history behind it) I don’t want to reveal too many of the plot points.  (I knew of neither the film’s background nor of the story from which it came at the time of my viewing.)

So, go rent the damned thing already.

The Super-Suit and the Grammarian

I have been watching episodes of “The Greatest American Hero“.  Don’t ask why.  I don’t have a good explanation.

(Well, ok.  That’s not strictly true.  I have been studying superheroes, I wrote my honors thesis on superheroes, and I’ll be writing a book on superheroes once I get enough research behind me.  But all that aside, I have no good reason to be watching this show.)

The premise, even the very infrastructure of the show itself, is a bit of comedy.  A space craft comes to Earth and delivers to an Odd Couple a suit which turns it’s steward into a superhero with the express purpose of fighting for goodness.  The Odd Couple here consists of a cardboard, hard-edged FBI agent and a post-hippie, aspiring pacifist, special-ed teacher.  Oh, and this is during the cold war, so most of their time they fight the good fight against the commies and promoting the American democraticapitalist ideal.  Apparently no one told them that all space aliens were enlightened beings who saw past the petty conflicts underlying Earth politics.

If there is one, I’m getting closer to the point of this post so bear with me.

Tonight I watched the fifth episode titled “Saturday on Sunset Boulevard”.  The opening scene of which is a fantastically over-the-top lovers’ dilema that would make a romance novelist blush.  This scene is comedy enough to warrant watching the episode.  But, wait; there’s more.

The episode carries one of the greatest continuity breaks I have ever seen.  The mainest of the main characters (Ralph) finds himself one moment getting into the backseat of a parked car, then appears next to a man standing at the front of said car, and finally appears in the backseat again having changed his clothes (in fact, having stripped down to the super-suit).

But the icing on the cake is a one-liner uttered from one minor character to another in response to a particularly bizaar monolog: “Ain’t nothing wrong with your grammar learning English wouldn’t fix”.

Laughter may not be the best medicine, but I’m hooked.  I haven’t had this much fun since Super Chicken.

Sailing Away with the “Quiet Man”

Just watched another film worth talking about.  Well in my case worth writing about.

This is one of those films where you see the trailer on some independent film your friend brings over and you think “hey, that looks pretty good” and then you forget about it until, years later, you find a copy in a collection at someone’s house where you are visiting for an important dinner party and you can’t actually ask about the film so you forget about it again.  This is a mental cud film.  It’ll keep coming back up for a chew.

Benefit from my benevolent prodding.

It’s probably no surprise to anyone that I rather like films which prompt one to look back over one’s shoulder and wonder how the hell did I get here?  No surprise indeed.

Well, Christian Slater and a host of other top shelf actors were involved in one such project called He Was a Quiet Man.  Slater plays his role masterfully amid a supporting cast which never relents, superb acting all around.

I should make mention also of writer and director Frank A. Cappello (who also wrote the screen play for Constantine).  We’ll have to keep an eye on him, just in case.

Many of the scenes are remarkable constructions.  The box escape scene comes quickly to mind.  And the whole film reminded me of the slipping back and forth between reality and fantasy in the film La Science des rêves.

Ostensibly the film is about a guy who goes postal at his cubicle and kills a bunch of his co-workers.  Stopping to chit-chat with Slater’s character, he gets distracted long enough to get shot five times.  As with any good film, this is just the framework onto which the important story elements are hung like glittering christmas lights.

Underneath all of this, the electricity which glitters the lights, we have a tale of impending madness and modern solitude.  It is the story of the Invisible Man brought to the boiling point, yearning to be seen but once seen yearning to be invisible again.  One  cannot hide in the shadows when all the world is alight.

I remain a little uncertain about the ending, especially having watched the extras.  I’ll give it a week and watch it again.

Nonetheless, go out there and get yourself a copy.  Be prepared to be a little disturbed as the introspection probes mount.  C’mon, you remember the first time you watched Blue Velvet.  It’s worth it.

Ooh, big hug you crazy kids!